What is Scotty Boy afraid of? Is he scared to face a Harvard professor with impeccable credentials in the financial world? Is he convinced that he won't change anyone's mind when he debates Warren? Does he already sense that this would be a "fail" for him? Sheesh. What a baby.

Marcia,
From my knowledge Scott has never abused his power in any elected office to date. He has been truthful and diligent in his representation of his constituents. Ms. Warren on the other hand has started out embellishing the truth. Her native American roots claim has many people upset. Me being one of them, I can easily prove that I am a 13th generation descendant from the Mayflower. If it is true why is she having such difficulty being accountable for her statement?

If she (Ms. Warren) would tout this mistruth as fact I'm sure it would only be the start of a countless legacy of deceit. Scott has done us all a service of one who represents our best interests. A baby, not quite. Smart about a potential trap and wise enough to know it... You bet!

He's probably too busy meeting secretly with kings and queens to participate in the debate. It's a privilege that we in Massachusetts don't really deserve, to be represented by somebody who looks as good in a suit as does Scott Brown.

Ms. Warren's character is above reproach. She handled the indian ancestry very well. She answered every question asked of her. She graciously received the Cherokee delegation from Oklahoma and thanked them for their birthday present. She filled out all her applications to Upenn and Harvard
truthfully and honestly. She did not take advantage of the system. She was a tremendous adviser to Traveler's insurance in handling the asbestos
mesothelioma complaints showing them how to file for bankruptcy to avoid paying the claims. And she is even environmentally conscientious. Did you know that right before she was going to run for the senate she drove a nice expensive BMW and as soon as she entered the race, she is driving a Prius.
She should have bought a Jeep Cherokee. (Sarcasm intended)

What has always been so upsetting to me is the inflammatory and biased language that many of you commentors employ when taking your stands on either side of an issue or candidate. Party lines, rote recitations, mindless succumbing to whatever extreme position is put out there makes it glaringly obvious that there are so very few folks that are actually capable of thinking independently and then communicating a well thought out position. One thing that is especailly irksome is the quickness of many to point the finger at "the Republicans" or "Wall Street" or "the Teaparty" or "ultra left wing liberals" when instead you all should be pointing the fingers at yourselves for the role that you all have played in Wall Street when you buy mutuals funds for your IRA, or when you sell a home for more than it is really worth or borrow money that you can not repay with the money that you earn. In other words don't let these generalizations become the party line, use language that is civil, don't be hypocritcal when you point the finger at someone else, don't hold double standards, act like adults, stand up and act like a man or woman and don't be a shit about it all.