patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

POLL: National Grid Facing Unprecedented Fines

Are the fines imposed against National Grid sufficient?

 

As we near the one-year anniversary of Tropical Storm Irene, which left thousands of Wrentham residents (and nearly a million total Massachusetts residents) without power for days, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley is proving that she hasn't forgotten what she calls an "inadequate response" to both the tropical storm and an October snowstorm with similar results.

Coakely is recommending a $16 million fine against the company – the largest penalty ever recommended against a utility in Massachusetts, according to a statement from her office released Thursday.

The penalties, if passed would not affect National Grid customers and would have to be borne on shareholders.

The AG’s Office made the recommendation in a brief filed Wednesday with the Department of Public Utilities (DPU), which has the authority to impose the fine. According to the AG’s brief, National Grid officials violated four separate storm response obligations under the company’s emergency response plan (ERP) including:

  • Failing to communicate effectively with customers and municipalities throughout the two major storms;
  • Failing to provide timely damage assessments;
  • Failing to properly staff for the two emergency events; and
  • Failing to respond to public safety calls about downed wires.

“Combined, these two storms left nearly a million National Grid customers without power, some for more than a week,”Coakley said in a statement. “National Grid’s preparation for these storms was inadequate and its response was unacceptable. The company compounded these mistakes with a lack of communication to municipalities and first responders about restoration efforts, leaving many of them in the dark as they were making critical decisions around public safety and emergency treatment.”

To read the full statement from Coakley's office, click here.

So Wrentham, we want to know ...

Today's question: Do you think Coakley's recommendation is appropriate?

  • Do you think a $16 million fine for National Grid's response to Irene and the October snowstorm is appropriate?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes! The response time was terrible.
        0 (0%)
    • No. Nobody could have foreseen such a devastating storm and an October snowstorm.
        1 (100%)
    • Not sure
        0 (0%)
    Total votes: 1
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: National Grid

Dan capone

7:12 am on Saturday, July 28, 2012

The fine will be deposited in the states general fund. Why is it not returned to homeowners based on number of days without service???? Why does the commonwealth benefit from the inconvenience of the citizens?? Having been without power for 10 days, this action is no personal remedy, but rather an action which forces the utility to increase staff to meet faster response times in the rare event of a similar storm which will be paid for on a daily basis with higher rates to follow. So, how does this fine help anyone?

Reply

David Miles

7:18 am on Saturday, July 28, 2012

The State is just making another money grab that they will waste on something stupid or feed the corruption. Why not force National Grid to use the money to improve the infrustucture so that it is less likely to happen again, OR reimburse customers for the suffering they went through? Sending money to the State is just a dumb idea. No wonder Martha got crused in the election for Senator.

Reply

Jeffrey Schweitzer

9:51 am on Sunday, July 29, 2012

Why not take the money and send it to towns in the National Grid coverage area so they can start a fund to create their own town utility companies?

Reply

Leave a comment